I'm right though aren't I.

=#8000FFShame by the rules of the game for it not to be a knock on he had to REGAIN possession before putting it down for a try, downward pressure is for a loose ball in the in goal area from a defensive error or kick - not your own knock on.

no, it was never ever a try, even the player himself gave himself up when he slapped the ground in disgust when he missed the ball.

He didn't knock on. I've not read anything yet about the forward pass for one of Ainscough's tries, you remember, the one which also involved a blatant obstruction. Move on, Cas lost.

Oh so now he missed the ball altogether? Typical Hull fan,thick as pig cack.

go fishing on your own board

That wasn't obstruction. The man had already gone through and your man was already committed, hence try given.

not just me saying he KNOCKED ON

NO OBSTRUCTION, cant go to screen for forward pass,

see thread on VT fans from various clubs saying Watts try never was,

To be fair, I'm not fishing, I've said Cas were the better of the two teams on the night, and that Bentham had a poor game.

=#8000FFOk, while we're bringing up other decisions in the game:



Cockayne knocking the ball out of Ainscough's arms into touch + Ainscough tackled in the air by Welham - Hull KR head & feed - WRONG

Dobson knocks on an up & under, makes a break gets a good 70 yard - play on - WRONG

Watts incorrect play the ball & obstruction - try given - WRONG

Welham offside for Cockayne try - try given - WRONG

Newton elbows Higgins in the face - Hull KR penalty - WRONG

Ainscough disallowed try with no conclusive evidence - No try - WRONG



Oh and there was no obstruction on any Cas try, just dummy runners - big difference.