Sounds like an exam question for a masters degree. Discuss in no more than 10 thousand words. My feeling is that we've let things slip through a number of unambitious and unspired coach appointments at all levels of the club. Blease and Arthur were a huge leap in the right direction and despite the mixed start to 25 I think things are changing for the better. You posted somewhere about being worried about recruitment given the uncertainty around Arthur's future. I couldn't reply because the site is very wobbly, but my view is that whether he stays or not we should commit to the intensley physical style he wants us to play and recruit players with that in mind. Any potential incoming coach could make a choice on that basis.

If that's the case I'd be staggered. I get BA likes Frawley, and his defence is decent, but surely Connor at 7, Frawley at 9 with JOC as replacement is the way to go. Connor at 7 has been one of the few bright spots so far this season. We're not blessed with creativity, Connor gives us that. Plus he kicks. 

There is that, yes. Though still think Connor offers more at 7 than Frawley ever could. 

If that`s the case it is very poor judgement from Arthur and doesn`t send the right message imo.
Connor has over the last few games been more or less our best player and the only one with the skills to unlock a defence.
Frawley on the other hand has been average at times and woeful with his kicking game similar to the season before.
If he goes on to select Lisone as well then I really do not know what to make of his intentions especially as he has been very vociferous in saying those who perform will be selected.
 

Honestly have no idea how Frawley gets in. His kicking game is atrocious. 

I thought he might be much better this year but nothing showing that way yet.., complete waste of a quota spot as it stands.