Last tackler, pulls player down, officials give penalty try



IT HAS TO BE A SIN BIN



James child too young and inexperienced with no empathy for the players or relationship with the game



Send him on a man management course, ne needs guidance and mentoring

Exactly so why blow for some real picky offences if yer not prepared to do it for 80 minutes?

I think the opposite is actually true. I think you shouldn't sin bin an offending player for a penalty try as the offense is the nullified

Disagree with you on this.



If you award a penalty try - it's got to be for an offence that will, in the view of the ref (or VR in this case), undoubtedly stop the opposition from scoring.



As such, it's a professional foul and should be dealt with via 10 mins in the cooler.

Agree. It's like saying a defender in footballer who gives away a penalty when he is the last man shouldn't be sent off because the penalty has been given.

No its not. Its like someone handling on the goal line, but it still going in.



Its just something I have heard, that you can't be sin binned if you give a penalty try. Maybe one of our resident (practicing) refs can help us out

Yep, that's a better analogy. I'm not that good on Football.

Professional foul - sin bin.

yes

Agreed and the same goes for Ah Vans high shot on Burrow. Burrow made the break, Ah Van hit him high, Ganson gives a penalty so it must be a sin bin its a clear professional foul.



But don't mention theses 2 cases to any Dulls fans because they we're squeaky clean and the nasty Rhinos cheated.

There was no way in this world that =#FF0000any team in =#FF0000any hemisphere could have played the rules that James Child was playing to on Saturday.



He was a first class idiot. His interpretation of the rules nobody could play to. He was pinning players who had just made the tackle. I would guess at least half of those penalties he gave on Saturday would not have been given by =#FF0000any other ref that weekend.



The way Silverwood reffed the game was a million miles ahead of any other ref this weekend.

As neither a Bulls or Rhinos fan I find it quite amusing to read your board and their board regarding Ganson. On their board they think Ganson had a leeds shirt on and on here you think he should have had a bulls shirt on





As an impartial viewer I found it strange that a penalty try was given. Surely the penalty try is given where it is clear a try would have been scored. Whilst it is possible that he would have scored, it is by no means certain, as other bulls players were close enough to either kick the ball out or dive on the ball.



If a penalty try is given by a possible try then a penalty try should have been given to the bulls earlier on when Delaney took Royston out when a clear try scoring opportunity presented itself????



I thought that Ganson was his usual inconsistant self and seemed to favour the bulls for a short period then favour the rhinos for a while, hence why the difference in opinons on each site.



Fair play to Leeds however, as they could have easily been dead and burried when 18 points behind.