That's right O'Loughlin got off after taking Luke Robinson's head off.

It wasnt exactly the head, and tbh I wouldnt have complained had he got banned. It shows how bad the reffing is when Lockers doesnt get at least a yellow but Coley gets one last friday.

Honestly cant remember them, but if they were as bad as the Bailey one then we couldnt have complained.

Depends how you look at it:



Follow your troll view and you get the above. A more balanced view may result in the following:



Nick Scrutons careless/unintentional spear tackle.

Lee Smith kicking out in the tackle attempting to re gain his feet.

Keith senior...see above.

Carl Abletts shoulder charge on Tomkins (Obviously didnt decapitate him did he..if he had his head would have come off...it didnt..if was back playing in the next phase of play).



HTH

As bad as the Bailey one? What planet are you living on?



A raised knee is a raised knee. That is all Bailey did on Friday, nothing more. On that basis the precedent for a raised knee is a caution, bearing in mind two players from just the one club have already received that this season.

Q: When is a raised knee not a raised knee?



A: When it is committed by Ryan Bailey or against a Wigan player, it then becomes attempted murder.

Well I know which way your looking at it, the biassed way. Get a grip mate, it wasnt a shoulder charge. It was a disgracefull effort that should result in a ban. Coley got sent off a few weeks back and got a 2 match ban, I had no arguments about that and completely agreeed, and that wasnt as bad as . So why dont you try the unbiassed approach. Maybe Tomkins should stay down longer next time and milk it abit longer rather than toughing it out, would that make you happy.

What the hell are you going on about, i havent defended the Wigan players for doing it. All I said was I dont remember them. All im saying is that if the Wigan players were as bad as Baileys they should get the same punishment. If he gets off I wont complain, if thats what has happened before.

[urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=1557[/url

Are you really that stupid? Calm down for 2 seconds and point out where I said Bailey should be banned? All ive said is that if Bailey gets a ban, then I agree that the Wigan players should got on aswell and that we couldnt have complained if they had. All we want is some consistency. Im sorry if i worded it badly but I havent said Bailey should get banned, tbh i dont think he should.



Some of you are bloody touchy on this site

Then you would expect the same for Bailey.



and here it is [urlhttp://www.therfl.co.uk/about/disciplinary_item.php?id=2143[/url

I'm only interested to see how many games brother Joel gets for his unwarranted intervention that could have caused a mass brawl, just as we saw last Thursday at the Shay in similar circumstances.



If anything brother Joel did Leeds a favour on the night by creating a distraction and one which allowed his younger brother to demonstrate just how badly shook up he was (by the Ablett challenge) by attempting to join in.