[urlhttp://www.superleague.co.uk/article.php?id=21471[/url

He's been refferred to the dis committee.

If true then a ban is deserved.

I remember Sinfield being hurt in a tackle, and the two having words on the floor before the PTB.

Sure it will have been accidental but a ban is due if guilty.



I'm sure the goons will be bidding for him in due course.

Moore was a bit feisty on Saturday, it has to be said! Damn shame if he is found guilty as it means I can't take the mick out of Wigan anymore!



But if he did what he has been charged with then he deserves his punishment.

I'll have to watch the video back, to see if there is anything in it.



He'll be missed though, if he cops a ban. I though his utility showed well in the Leeds game and he showed a lot of experience in order to support Gaskell and Lomax with a range of skills and plays. I've been critical of him in the past.

typical red hall don't like yorshire teams beat specially leeds. As for it being on sinfield he diserves it the cheap shot merchant.

I agree. He'd been paying attention at training I think as he made some great passes, tackled hard (although he does always do that) and as you say, supported our halfbacks really nicely.



My, the RFL have totally turned around this season haven't they?

Don't remember the ref getting involved in Moore and sinfields handbags. This come up after review or sinfield makin a Wilkinesk complaint??

0/10 Poor attempt

It's just been on Sky Sports News.



He wraps his legs around Sinfields legs to bring him down, nothing a lot of players don't do every week.

Time to rewatch the 74th minute on replay when the kids have gone to bed.