who are more pedestrian in attack than we are???? The amount of times we are in attack (more often than not when Addy had the ball) we are completely motionless. No pace in the attack, no movement. Sort it out Potter.

i personally would love to see royston come in as FB and kearney coming in as hooker or stand off where he gets us going!

Well Addy doesn't have a clue at times, but then again he's not a hooker.

Most teams in the Championship have more structure, idea and zip than the Bulls do in attack.

Addy did fine, it was the garbage around him to blame.

No he didn't, he started off ok but then it went down hill. As I say though he's not a hooker so can't really blame the lad.

Who is blaming him? A part time hooker was far better than some of our so called regulars.

Do you think we would have been as slow and motionless in attack with L'Estrange at hooker? My point is that although a number of players didn't look interested, without an actual hooker we missed the go forward they would have offered, which was partly to blame for our poor attack.

You watching the same game?

I was watching the game, unlike you who was diggiing up old threads.

0/10

In response to the OP, No.