Just to add the other side to the coin, I wouldn't be in favour but we've had all the arguments for both sides before.

Just to be clear I'd only be in favour if there were no realistic possiblility of staying at odsal. I'm not in the category who would refuse to attend at VP and went to all games there last time. Just didnt like it and much prefer odsal, even in its current state. Big plus for me is I can stand at odsal which is something I dont think can be accomodated at VP under footbal league rules. Hate sitting at a rugby match

Really cant see city going down this season to be honest, and if city did move to odsal it would just kill the atmosphere we have at VP

If they do go down which players would we go in for?

I doubt City will be relegated, Taylor has to get 3 points at Macclesfield or the board will sack him IMO. It's a very tight league table this year, two wins would change everything. Plus there are several long term absentees coming back from injuries this week and an experienced striker making his debut.



The pitch could be lengthened at VP to accommodate the Bulls too, either take rows out of the front of the Kop or demolish the TL Dallas stand.

Dunno to be honest.



However, on the first point, what the owners want isn't necessarily what the owners will get. What is their investment worth without a tenant? I'd guess that even as a building plot it, in Bradford it wouldn't be worth vast amounts of dosh right now, even with any planning permission, which presumably, they haven't got anyway. Again a guess, but in a situation where City could no longer afford to operate from there, I suspect the owners would actually be pretty desperate for someone to come in.



On the second point, if the rental agreement remains in place and City can't afford to pay it, then the owners need to look back at point one, because if they try to enforce it and the club just don't have the cash it can only go one way, which is receivership, and the main point then, for the owners, is that they still won't get their money.



Any item, commodity or service is only worth what someone else is willing to pay for it and a sports ground in Bradford is only really of value to a sports club in Bradford. I'd suspect they would settle for a lot less than many might think. Not that I think City are doomed, far from it.

I've said it before, but sitting down at RL matches just isn't as good. I could cope with moving from Odsal but being forced into being seated and driving to that side of Bradford would be a pain for me.



I can't see myself ever not supporting the club but I would have to be convinced that all other realistic options had been considered before I'd accept it. These discussions frustrate the hell out of me!

bcafc.livewwware.co.uk/viewtopic ... 4db1be76e0 Some of the above makes interesting reading.

bcafc.livewwware.co.uk/viewtopic ... 4db1be76e0 Some of the above makes interesting reading.

To be brutally honest I found the City to Odsal / Bulls to VP debate 'interesting' the first 600 times but no one says anything new.

Sems like a vast majority of the Bantams fans are in favour.....

Which I'm shocked about considering the previous hostility between the two.

Maybe if you checked out the thread you'd see BR was being sarcastic...