|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3f3f/b3f3f6e1aec8e9d0b37053fc63c220c7b2abbfc7" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 582 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2012 | 13 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2013 | May 2013 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Weak RFL management, taking the biff out of rugby, might as well watch netball !
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 813 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2015 | Oct 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Knuckles="Knuckles"Weak RFL management, taking the biff out of rugby, might as well watch netball !'"
Wouldn't go that far data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0d1b1/0d1b163ff8c197d1ed702dca9735636ea100c7ee" alt="Very Happy icon_biggrin.gif"
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 6880 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| It had to be banned based both on the evidence and the fact that players seemed unable to do it properly. Anyone who claims to be "fuming" about the loss of this area of marginal importance to the sport of Rugby League needs to reconsider their grasp on reality.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7152 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote MjM="MjM"It had to be banned based both on the evidence and the fact that players seemed unable to do it properly. Anyone who claims to be "fuming" about the loss of this area of marginal importance to the sport of Rugby League needs to reconsider their grasp on reality.'"
What evidence? None has been given!
It's nothing but a knee-jerk reaction to a handful of high-profile reckless challenges - starting with the Inglis hit last year and being blown out of all reasonable proportion by a weak and pathetic media, most of whom have never played.
If it's so dangerous show me all those players who've been killed by, been disabled by, had their careers ended by or been permanently injured by, a shoulder charge. Can you? And the consider how many have suffered all of the above from other challenges - legal or otherwise.
As for 'reality' - the reality is they've removed even the possibility of one of the most dramatic sights and uplifting sights in the game. The reality is that we've had it for 113 years without anyone's career being ended by a shoulder charge. The reality is if we're banning shoulders because some are high, we should ban arms as some of those are also high. The reality is almost without exception players agree with me, most fans agree with me and [url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/21535457 SL coaches agree with me[/url.
The reality is RL has just become even more repetitive and that little bit more dull.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Luke Burgess? Maurie Fa'asavalu? Any concussion is a serious injury, with the potential for it to be life threatening, repeated concussions will bring about serious health problems. The game has to show that when contact with the head is made it is unacceptable. Completely so.
There are two options, either the shoulder charge is banned and everyone is punished or we see 10-15 game bans for those that do make contact with the head.
would the game be accepting of Rangi Chase missing a third of the year and Bousquet probably half the year?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 12006 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Mar 2019 | Oct 2014 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I'd have kept it personally.
Hits like the one from Tommy Leuluai on Maurie Faasavalu are fantastic.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7152 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote SmokeyTA="SmokeyTA"Luke Burgess? Maurie Fa'asavalu? Any concussion is a serious injury, with the potential for it to be life threatening, repeated concussions will bring about serious health problems. The game has to show that when contact with the head is made it is unacceptable. Completely so.'"
I said 'permanent injury'. I'm not saying there's no risk, but there's risk in almost every tackle. I've broken a clavicle, hand, several fingers, a couple of ribs, an ankle, split my eye, torn my ear and lost teeth playing Rugby League, not to mention the dozens of muscular, ligament and tendon injuries - not one of which resulted from a shoulder charge, and I've been on the end of (and handed out) a few.
Attacks the head are entirely unacceptable, and if for some reason it's felt that risk has somehow suddenly increased after 113 years of RL, increase the penalties proportionately.
Quote SmokeyTAThere are two options, either the shoulder charge is banned and everyone is punished or we see 10-15 game bans for those that do make contact with the head.'"
Absolutely agree. Players need to learn restraint and control when they see an opportunity for a big shot. Do it right or face the consequences.
Quote SmokeyTAwould the game be accepting of Rangi Chase missing a third of the year and Bousquet probably half the year?'"
If those were the rules, yes.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Cronus="Cronus"I said 'permanent injury'. I'm not saying there's no risk, but there's risk in almost every tackle. I've broken a clavicle, hand, several fingers, a couple of ribs, an ankle, split my eye, torn my ear and lost teeth playing Rugby League, not to mention the dozens of muscular, ligament and tendon injuries - not one of which resulted from a shoulder charge, and I've been on the end of (and handed out) a few.
Attacks the head are entirely unacceptable, and if for some reason it's felt that risk has somehow suddenly increased after 113 years of RL, increase the penalties proportionately.'" A broken jaw is a permanent injury. A concussion is a permanent injury. You live with the effects of those injuries for ever.
And nobody is saying the risks have suddenly increased (but improvements in fitness, as well as strength and conditioning coaching have like seen more force in these collisions, and that’s only going one way) its that over time the responsibilities and expectations have changed. The RFL cannot even look like they aren’t clamping down 100% on, not only players making contact with the head, but players being reckless as to whether they do.
Quote CronusAbsolutely agree. Players need to learn restraint and control when they see an opportunity for a big shot. Do it right or face the consequences.
If those were the rules, yes.'" So at the moment we are seeing about 2 players a week banned for upwards of 10 games, how long can that last? And if the draconian bans do what we want and stop people attempting them, whats the difference between that and banning them?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 2855 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2009 | 16 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2017 | Oct 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| I would have preferred it if they kept it. A good shoulder charge is one of the more spectacular plays in the game and I think it diminishes the spectacle of the game a little without them.
Personally I think game is running scared due a class action industrial injury lawsuit being filed in the US from a large group of former NFL players and their families relating to brain injuries sustained due to multiple concussive hits over their careers. The NFL have since introduced rule changes such as banning helmet to helmet hits and shortening kick offs which are seen by many as actions which reduce the risk of these types of injuries.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 1848 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2013 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2016 | Apr 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote Cronus="Cronus"Jake Webster: Got 2 shoulders for sale. Regrettable sale as I have worked hard to get them up to standard. But they are not needed anymore.'"
My personal favourite data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f86c7/f86c7205445988cd0daef8bc15ad783785c38ef0" alt="Laughing icon_lol.gif"
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 10399 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2016 | Jul 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| They should be legal until they hit the head, that's when current rules should take over.
The debate comes about because of instances like Bailey on Fa'asavlu and Puletua on Mounis.
Sometimes, not just with SCharges, contact with the head can happen and it not be an illegal challenge - ducking into the tackle, for instance.
In challenges similar to the ones named above, the ball carrier has run face first into a wall of shoulder belong to the defender who is reletively static.
There has to be [isome[/i repsonsibilty taken by the ball carrier for his own well being, hasn't there?
Allow shoulder charges, don't allow high tackles.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7152 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote SmokeyTA="SmokeyTA"A broken jaw is a permanent injury. A concussion is a permanent injury. You live with the effects of those injuries for ever.'"
No, they're not. They're the same as most other injuries in that in most cases they'll heal. A broken jaw will usually heal unless there are complications. Concussion will usually disappear after a few days or weeks. Only the most severe examples of each will have permanent effects. But again, each tackle runs the risk of an injury that could have permanent effects (just ask Kevin Ward). Should we therefore ban all contact?
Quote SmokeyTAAnd nobody is saying the risks have suddenly increased (but improvements in fitness, as well as strength and conditioning coaching have like seen more force in these collisions, and that’s only going one way) its that over time the responsibilities and expectations have changed. The RFL cannot even look like they aren’t clamping down 100% on, not only players making contact with the head, but players being reckless as to whether they do.'"
But why now? Why is it suddenly a critical issue? Yes, ask a doctor and he'll tell you to ban it, or run a risk assessment and it'll come out as unacceptably dangerous. Just as sprinting into two sixteen-stone men who are doing their best to flatten you is in general.
Quote SmokeyTASo at the moment we are seeing about 2 players a week banned for upwards of 10 games, how long can that last? And if the draconian bans do what we want and stop people attempting them, whats the difference between that and banning them?'"
Lengthy bans and hefty fines would soon have players thinking twice. And what we'd see is less of the attacks to the head (which are after all, the problem, not the 'shoulder charge' per se), whilst still permitting the more common shoulder-to-shoulder/body collision which does very little to no actual damage but looks fantastic and lifts both your team and the crowd.
|
|
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3f3f/b3f3f6e1aec8e9d0b37053fc63c220c7b2abbfc7" alt="" |
|