very much doubt they will do the deal so soon but great to see an agreement from all clubs. Mind you they think it will put them in charge of the game so no wonder they are keen.

they will own the game and make decisions on the future



after love goes they will be in charge.

That jerseys fecking terrible.

Why do they all look so homoretarded?

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... -mgqk.html michael searle "The upside is that we're on a surging wave where the game continues to get back to its pre-1995 support in its core markets. The fact that we're now dominating some of our competitors means that we probably need the best possible structure to maximise it as well. " were back baby

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... -mgqk.html michael searle "The upside is that we're on a surging wave where the game continues to get back to its pre-1995 support in its core markets. The fact that we're now dominating some of our competitors means that we probably need the best possible structure to maximise it as well. " were back baby

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... -mgps.html ALL bar one NRL club - believed to be Melbourne Storm - will be profitable within five years, the salary cap could increase to $6 million and representative stars could earn $25,000 an origin and Test match if an independent commission takes over the running of the game. esp. clubs becoming profitable and the rep payments going from $8000 - $12,000 up to $25,000 / game

www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... -mgps.html ALL bar one NRL club - believed to be Melbourne Storm - will be profitable within five years, the salary cap could increase to $6 million and representative stars could earn $25,000 an origin and Test match if an independent commission takes over the running of the game. esp. clubs becoming profitable and the rep payments going from $8000 - $12,000 up to $25,000 / game

www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 5821364086 fate of storm holding up commission why should they be guaranted $30 million from the game when other clubs dont get it news ltd will be getting money for walking away early. they can use this money to prop up the storm.

www.dailytelegraph.com.au/sport/ ... 5821364086 fate of storm holding up commission why should they be guaranted $30 million from the game when other clubs dont get it news ltd will be getting money for walking away early. they can use this money to prop up the storm.

900,000 viewers for a GF, that's why!



oh and News have signed a deal with the Vic Govt guaranteeing the Storm play in the new stadium for the next 5 years, hence why they won't leave unless this is covered. They are legally contracted.



Oh and the fact they get a shed of $'s from RL fans in Vic who can;t watch the game on FTA due to our frickless leaders.

news ltd signed the deal did they?







that whole post was made up



one day the tv rights will be worth something



today they are worth zero



the storm are a burden on the game.



for how long is the question.



michael searle has said they will not cover the losses forever, and 5 years is the limit



the storms future is important cause if they fail forget about wa

yes as the owners of Storm they did. As usual you've no clue what you're talking about. Care to show a link to refute anything I've posted?

the deal was with the arl to bring origins and test matches to melbourne in return for the new ground



news ltd dont sign on behalf of the ARL dunce, as much as theyd like too

Does this mean we'll see less Aussies moving to SL? If so I'm all for it. This is perhaps the shunt this country needs to begin developing it's homegrown talent properly.