You can see daylight between Tate's fingertips and the ball. If you don't have eyes that can see that keep off here any lay off the sauce.

missing blatant forward passes and knock ons isnt interpretation, its bad refereeing. i've seen a bit of nrl this year and always watch the internationals and its been clear for some time that our referees are several levels above the rubbish in the nrl. add in the australian hatred of everything british and their inability to act in a professional manner and what do you expect?

Yeah, four of his fingers and thumbs. What about the other finger that grounded the ball?

So he was holding the ball one handed and somehow managed to put it down with one finger without losing control or knocking on

Please do not use the words 'no control.' The word 'control' does not feature in the rule book under the section about scoring a try.

It was never a try

How can the ball bounce 6 feet in the air if it is grounded? The motion of the ball proves it was bounced/dropped.

Is the correct answer. If anything should prove whether it's a try or not, it's the fact the ball bounces into the air. With proper controlled grounding, the ball stays [ion the ground[/i.

It clearly hit the line then moved back before he moved it forward again. Much clearer try than Tate's or the one with the ridiculous forward pass. So that's best part of 18 points difference.

The problem with slo mo video reffing is it throws up more doubt than going with a live call. At full speed it was never a try in a million years (which of course it wasn't).

The Aussies' customary pre-match meeting with the officials.