No it isn't. Not if the one that has been trading longer has been on a knife edge and in actual fact had no sound foundations whatsoever. Don't let facts get in the way of the crap you're spewing on here ..... AGAIN !!! Who's the safer bet now? Widnes or Celtic? Or should i ignore the facts?????

Just because you support expansion doesn't make you close minded. The way you support expansion and the fact that you won't change your position on it no matter how many times you contradict yourself or how many times there are examples of failure show a closed mind to me. You are not open to other ways.

i dont support expansion to moscow, ireland, scotland, barcelona right now.



i supported CC because i thought it was worth a shot.



i thought it would work out



faced with taking a risk with widnes or CC, i was happy the RFL went with CC.



its the same risk taking that saw them gamble on Les Cats when every supposed internet expert said it was a waste of time after PSG failed



if the RFL try 10 expansion clubs and end up with 2 or 3 clubs like Les Cats ill say job well done



id be willing to try again in wales if the plans looked good

Wrong again. Not the same risk at all.

There's more holes in your posts that Big Greame's pikelets !!!

accountacy 1a.



widnes couldnt even sustain an NL1 team without practically going broke and you think 6 months later they are ready for SL?



very logical

No that is nothing like what I was suggesting was it , what I was pointing out that if a successful businessman followed the rules he has built his business on , he would have nothing to do with a sports business .





But what happens is successful businessmen do get involved with proffesional sport , unfortunatley they then dont run them like businesses



Because you can have the most successful sports business in the world and lose millions , because the success of a sports business is measured differently to a normal business



A normal business can be the worst performing in it's field but still be a success



You obviously will not understand this post and will reply with some inane comment about Leigh rlfc and 100 years

I'm giving up with Dally. I don't know why i bite. It's like debating with Rain Man.

mentioning leigh in reply to a post about succesful business would just too much out of whack

when did dustin hoffman become a member of rlfans?

And like magic , it appears

Best laugh of the day that rich





I've been lurking on several threads marvelling at the sheer doggedness of those who try to carry on a reasoned debate with this idiot.



Intellectually it is a complete waste of time and, I imagine, intensely frustrating ... but quite entertaining as a spectator sport.

nowt ont telly