data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/89bb2/89bb2a38360eaaff0df6582a280f6201638070a8" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3f3f/b3f3f6e1aec8e9d0b37053fc63c220c7b2abbfc7" alt="" |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12792 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2020 | Oct 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote leedsnsouths="leedsnsouths"Everything is more expensive on the August BHW but if Wakefield or Widnes got to the final and didn't half fill their allocation, the same people defending Catalan would saying we should get rid of small town teams.
You have just undone the argument that we need teams away from northern England, if Catalans (and Toronto) are just a club like any other then why couldn't it be Leigh or Bradford or whoever instead? Why were Catalan given special treatment to get them promoted and then ring fenced from relegation in their first year in SL? Why do Toronto get to play blocks of home and away games to make their fixture list easier?
I am not saying we should get rid of 'expansion' teams btw, just that I don't understand why some people seem to think it is better for the game to have Toronto in the league over say Fev, no matter what their on field performances are.'"
I'm not undoing any argument. I'm simply saying that if you're going to hold one club to performance a metric that is beyond their control, you need to hold all clubs to performance metrics beyond their control, rather than using this absurd double standard to judge Catalans.
The reality that you ignore is that Catalans are responsible for two failing clubs coming together to create one that is performing on the field and attracting gates that surpass many clubs in the heartlands, and that youth participation has increased in France since their introduction into SL. I ask you again; what more do you want them to achieve to be considered successful in their own right?
As for your last comment, the whole "why are some clubs more valuable than others?" thing comes down to commercial potential. How many potential sponsors are sat in meetings going "you know what? Featherstone is a real growth market for us!"? There is your answer. Sponsors and broadcasters, the people we need to attract to get more money into this sport, don't give a stuff about deprived former mining towns with 17,000 living in them.
You can decry that all you like and say that the only thing that should matter is what is on the pitch (ignoring that Fev have been nowhere near qualifying for SL since the switch to Summer) , but then you've no right to complain when this sport continues its decline and can only manage sponsorships from tinned mushy pea brands and payday loan sharks.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1999 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote bramleyrhino="bramleyrhino"I'm not undoing any argument. I'm simply saying that if you're going to hold one club to performance a metric that is beyond their control, you need to hold all clubs to performance metrics beyond their control, rather than using this absurd double standard to judge Catalans.
The reality that you ignore is that Catalans are responsible for two failing clubs coming together to create one that is performing on the field and attracting gates that surpass many clubs in the heartlands, and that youth participation has increased in France since their introduction into SL. I ask you again; what more do you want them to achieve to be considered successful in their own right?
As for your last comment, the whole "why are some clubs more valuable than others?" thing comes down to commercial potential. How many potential sponsors are sat in meetings going "you know what? Featherstone is a real growth market for us!"? There is your answer. Sponsors and broadcasters, the people we need to attract to get more money into this sport, don't give a stuff about deprived former mining towns with 17,000 living in them.
You can decry that all you like and say that the only thing that should matter is what is on the pitch (ignoring that Fev have been nowhere near qualifying for SL since the switch to Summer) , but then you've no right to complain when this sport continues its decline and can only manage sponsorships from tinned mushy pea brands and payday loan sharks.'"
Just when is this "commercial potential" going to come to fruition? We're seeing zilch so far, and from the numbers being bandied around recently, there's no expectation of any increase on what we've got now when the TV deal gets back on the table. Indeed, a decrease seems to be what is being expected?
There's still no evidence of a coherent plan for the game that will reverse this "decline", whether that means expansion or otherwise.
Your rhetoric is great, but there's nothing substantial and sustainable forthcoming for the good of the game based purely on clubs outside of the UK being part of our competition. In fact, given our limited resources, they are a drain due to the additional travel costs for clubs.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12792 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2020 | Oct 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote HXSparky="HXSparky"Just when is this "commercial potential" going to come to fruition? We're seeing zilch so far, and from the numbers being bandied around recently, there's no expectation of any increase on what we've got now when the TV deal gets back on the table. Indeed, a decrease seems to be what is being expected?
There's still no evidence of a coherent plan for the game that will reverse this "decline", whether that means expansion or otherwise.
Your rhetoric is great, but there's nothing substantial and sustainable forthcoming for the good of the game based purely on clubs outside of the UK being part of our competition. In fact, given our limited resources, they are a drain due to the additional travel costs for clubs.'"
Ultimately its down to the clubs to realise that potential, but the reality is that without the Catalans, we wouldn't have Super League aired on television sets in Continental Europe, we wouldn't have had companies like Renault or Air France KLM involved with the sport (both companies that have sponsored the Dragons in some capacity) and the geographic spread of this sport on a professional level would be the smallest it has ever been in the summer era.
But two things need bearing in mind firstly, its not going to fall into our lap. All clubs have a duty to go out there and grow their clubs using these tools, rather than expecting the tools to do it for them. And secondly, Catalans, Toronto and any other club will do things in their interests - to expect English clubs to benefit from the commercial successes of expansion clubs is laziness on their part.
As I've said plenty of times before, expansion is not necessarily THE answer, but it's currently the best answer we have. I've heard lots of people claiming that the answer is to "focus on the heartlands", but not one of those people claiming that can offer an explanation as to how doing so makes the sport relevant to new audiences and the modern TV and sponsorship market. If they could, I'd perhaps have more sympathy with the anti-expansion argument.
The sport spends too much time talking to the people who already buy it, and not nearly enough time talking to the people who don't. That needs to change.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1999 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote bramleyrhino="bramleyrhino"Ultimately its down to the clubs to realise that potential, but the reality is that without the Catalans, we wouldn't have Super League aired on television sets in Continental Europe, we wouldn't have had companies like Renault or Air France KLM involved with the sport (both companies that have sponsored the Dragons in some capacity) and the geographic spread of this sport on a professional level would be the smallest it has ever been in the summer era.
But two things need bearing in mind firstly, its not going to fall into our lap. All clubs have a duty to go out there and grow their clubs using these tools, rather than expecting the tools to do it for them. And secondly, Catalans, Toronto and any other club will do things in their interests - to expect English clubs to benefit from the commercial successes of expansion clubs is laziness on their part.
As I've said plenty of times before, expansion is not necessarily THE answer, but it's currently the best answer we have. I've heard lots of people claiming that the answer is to "focus on the heartlands", but not one of those people claiming that can offer an explanation as to how doing so makes the sport relevant to new audiences and the modern TV and sponsorship market. If they could, I'd perhaps have more sympathy with the anti-expansion argument.'"
So, genuine question, how does SL being aired in Europe and having Renault, Air France & KLM involved help the game IN THE UK?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12792 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2020 | Oct 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote HXSparky="HXSparky"So, genuine question, how does SL being aired in Europe and having Renault, Air France & KLM involved help the game IN THE UK?'"
Overseas TV coverage, used properly, increases the profile of the competition and our clubs. It also makes it easier for Sky to increase the number of hours of RL content on UK TV which, if used properly, provides opportunity to the clubs to increase their profile and drive up the value they offer to sponsors. If the clubs aren't capitalising on that, you need to take it up with them.
Renault sponsored the back of Catalans shirts in the earlier years of the club. Since then, they have sponsored the league as a whole with its Dacia brand for the last three years. That's money into the league - probably not a lot, but money nevertheless.
As for Air France KLM, let's remember that this is a Catalans sponsorship deal - there's no right for any club to demand a benefit from that. You wouldn't expect Halifax to benefit from Leeds' sponsorship with LBS.
So, there are the benefits. Some the sport has realised, but there are many that they haven't. As far as I'm concerned, the cost of some flights are an opportunity cost worth paying for that (and that's if you see it as a cost - Leeds' trips to France in most years cost the club nothing due to how they package up their away travel packages for the game).
Like I said, I'm willing to listen to any "focus on the heartlands" argument that actually addresses the challenges the sport faces - lack of commercial appeal and an aging, dwindling audience.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 13686 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Nov 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Feb 2025 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote HXSparky="HXSparky"So, genuine question, how does SL being aired in Europe and having Renault, Air France & KLM involved help the game IN THE UK?'"
Is that a serious question?
Having those type of companies invest in the SL helps the whole of SL, do you want less money coming into SL and fewer blue chip sponsors?
And of course SL being aired in Europe helps SL in the UK, it means SL is aired in Europe, it is that simple I cannot believe you think that couldn’t help the game.
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3019 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2020 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1999 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote bramleyrhino="bramleyrhino"Overseas TV coverage used properly, increases the profile of the competition and our clubs. It also makes it easier for Sky to increase the number of hours of RL content on UK TV which, if used properly, provides opportunity to the clubs to increase their profile and drive up the value they offer to sponsors. If the clubs aren't capitalising on that, you need to take it up with them.
Renault sponsored the back of Catalans shirts in the earlier years of the club. Since then, they have sponsored the league as a whole with its Dacia brand for the last three years. That's money into the league - probably not a lot, but money nevertheless.
As for Air France KLM, let's remember that this is a Catalans sponsorship deal - there's no right for any club to demand a benefit from that. You wouldn't expect Halifax to benefit from Leeds' sponsorship with LBS.
So, there are the benefits. Some the sport has realised, but there are many that they haven't. As far as I'm concerned, the cost of some flights are an opportunity cost worth paying for that.
Like I said, I'm willing to listen to any "focus on the heartlands" argument that actually addresses the challenges the sport faces - lack of commercial appeal and an aging, dwindling audience.'"
So, you think that Sky will be throwing more cash at SL etc when the deal comes round for renegotiation? In other more £££ for Uk clubs?
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1999 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote christopher="christopher"Is that a serious question?
Having those type of companies invest in the SL helps the whole of SL, do you want less money coming into SL and fewer blue chip sponsors?
And of course SL being aired in Europe helps SL in the UK, it means SL is aired in Europe, it is that simple I cannot believe you think that couldn’t help the game.'"
Serious question? Of course it is. What evidence is there that their "investment" will mean more £££ for UK clubs?
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1999 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2007 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Feb 2025 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
| | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 12792 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2020 | Oct 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote HXSparky="HXSparky"So, you think that Sky will be throwing more cash at SL etc when the deal comes round for renegotiation? In other more £££ for Uk clubs?'"
At the moment no, because I don't think we offer Sky enough value to justify a larger TV deal.
We don't offer the audience that advertisers will pay good money to reach, we dilute our own TV audience by allowing clubs to schedule fixture that clash with our TV slots, the product isn't actually that good at the moment (bigger winning matins, fewer games won by < 1 score and loop fixtures for example) , and we have effectively encouraged the top box office talent to leave the league through real-terms cuts in the salary cap.
But those issues are entirely separate to Catalans being in the league in the here and now. The state of our TV deal is entirely down to failures at club level, and expansion is just one method of mitigating that failure.
| | | |
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 3019 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2020 | Aug 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote HXSparky="HXSparky"I've won lots, but please expand?'"
The dumbest post I've ever read on RL Fans.
| | |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3f3f/b3f3f6e1aec8e9d0b37053fc63c220c7b2abbfc7" alt="" | |
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2025 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
|
|