not that realistic, who would play for us?



i don't think we could very easily go out and fill those gaps



however, in a non-realistic world i agree with all of your choices bar riley, wood, clarke, bridge (on the proviso that someone figures out what to do with his talent) and grix

I think you're being harsh on Paul Wood.



Isn't there a rule to have a certain amount of academy trained players from our club in the first team? Wood's a very decent prop and despite the injuries, he's still a good player and I wouldn't like to see him leave.

hicks has already gone. signed for union.

George is still talking as much rubbish as usual.



Who would have Hicks at 32?

although i agree with the hicks to union being nonsense



To answer your question, rugby union would

This is true.

I admit talking absolute rubbish after 10 pints of stout but the thing about hicks is 100% true.



paddy (who knows his stuff) got a call from a contact of his last night.

Everyone who wants to stay, stay, everyone who wants to go, go !

What if they want to stay for the wrong reasons

I cant really see Tony SMith hanging around keeping players who are not happy im just sure he is waiting for the right time to do it.. He cant just get rid of half the team without replacments that would be stupid and i dont thin TS is that kind of bloke.. He takes no nonsense and im sure he knows which players will not be having there contracts renewed.. Players that i would release would be ..



Anderson's x2

Monaghan

Clarke

Briers

Welease Woderick