You’re all spitting your dummies out because it’s a Warrington player. You all weren’t bothered when sione matautia was banned for the same offence.

Because it wasn't the same offence at all was it, apparently sione wrote in support saying he was deliberately being slow because he was running the clock down and admitted that he wasn't injured at all.



There needs to be an overhaul of the way the game is governed over here, there has been for some time to stop you lot getting preferential treatment.

If we win the next two or three games I'll definitely quit. Always best to finish on a high and not tarnish it with the inevitable decline afterwards.

I wont be. Got other things planned for tonight, i'd normally watch the friday night sky game. I doubt after this week i'll be frequenting this site either. Im finding it quite liberating tbh, breaking a habit becuase thats all it has been these last few years, the overall standard is poor then you get an incident like this and i just found myself questioning why im even watching any more, its a shadow of the game i used to love. Just be my luck that warrington win the GF and i didnt see it.

I'm not a million miles from that position.

My issue with this ban is that it’s trying to fix a problem that isn’t there. Rugby players, in both codes, are renowned for their actions in response to seeing a serious injury. We’ve witnessed people pulling out of tackles when someone has pulled hamstrings through to signalling the officials when someone is injured on the floor to allow medical staff on to the pitch. It’s a rule for the sake of a rule.



The rule makers should focus on the things blighting the game and making it unattractive to watch/play rather than trivial stuff.

It's the charging structure that's wrong and given the backlash, I fully expect it to change, can't remember whether it was Chambers or in Middletons letter that the charge used to be on a sliding scale from A to E. This for me all offences should be on a sliding scale so that you are able to grade any so you avoid this position where the MRP has backed itself into a corner because that is the category for this offence. There needs to be discretion in the sentence, a fine or one match ban would have still highlighted this but a four match ban is just crazy.

massive overreaction from our fans



did he break the rules ? yes



is it his responsibility to decide if a player is injured or not ? no



is it a good idea to drag a player up who is possibly injured ? no



is this the way most contact sports are going ? yes



if we want our sport to continue then we must change the game to make certain aspects of the game as safe as possible this is one of them measures, we have ward retired early josh jones too due to concussion injuries. being stupid and saying they knew they could get injured so there should be no safety measures put in place to protect the players as best they can.

So that won't be for a while then

Oh well, touch rugby here we come!

nothing to do with touch rugby but common sense if a payer is injured looks like he DO NOT try to lift him up not rocket science really is it ?



do we want our game gone as the fans refuse to accept the dangers the players are facing? or do we try to mitigate these for the game to continue, literally some fans clearly dont care about the safety of their players and are ok with them suffering after their career is over !!!!

I think everyone is behind player welfare and protecting the players, it's about how this applied that grinds my gears, and giving appropriate sanctions and the inconsistent nature.



You mentioned concussions (I'd also add Lachlan Coote and Kevin Brown, and a number of others). So how come Tommy Makinson has five instances cited for high tackles (yes I know only one was charged but five made contact with the head) he gets a fine. Whereas Vaughan tugs at a shirt of a player returning to his feet obviously taking the mickey and gets 4 games four games. I've said before the previous precedents (SKD, mata'utia) are not the same action (SKD had just clobbered him with a high shot so there was potential to be injured. Levi was on his back making no attempt to get up). It just sends out the wrong message and the priority is wrong however good natured the intent.