Still not stopping Saintsfan rising to his defence on the Saints forum.

How can anybody possibly defend that?????

Using these

Not really sure why he pleaded not guilty. The evidence was pretty damning and pleading not guilty would have probably seen a 25% reduction in the punishment, then he could have used 2/3 England games and a couple of trial games and he would have only missed 4/5 games.

He pleaded not guilty now that's funny.



12 match ban now if i was Mcnamara i would not pick him for England for a laugh.

bit harsh for a bit of foreplay - next time: get a room

It was said on another forum that Jammer could not have been guilty because of the fact that he does not have any teeth.

Imagine the courtroom when he is asked "how do you plead" and he whips out his falsies and says "noth guilthy".

'Eeh by gum, 12 matches'

That would have been great. Especially if they'd left it until the hearing to make the allegation look daft.

Scandalous decision. Saddo said he hadn't bit him and we all know how unbiased he is.

A long week in that London means you're first on the ban list.





Let's see what Saturday night brings and go from there?