Check the full match out on a well known vid sharing site.

Cricket is for pu#$¥s.



Class.

You could always have Lockers defending at SR and Flower at LF if you see it that way. Flower is a lot more mobile than Clubb anyway IMO. If we lack size in that back row by going Hughes-Farrell with Bateman on the bench I can see them steam-rolling us, we'll need that extra wallop IMO

Well even a stopped clock tells the right time twice a day.

1 - Bowen

2 - Charnley

3 - Goulding

4 - Sarginson

5 - Burgess

6 - Green

7 - Smith

8 - Taylor

9 - McIllorum

10 - Dudson

11 - Farrell

12 - Bateman

13 - O'Loughlin



14 - Flower

15 - Crosby

16 - Pettybourne

17 - Powell

NZ probably have the best secound phase creative forwards in the NRL.

They probably have one of the weakest / disjointed back Lines in the NRL ( on the edges where Wigan are exceptional , we are pathetic on attack and in defense ).



Mateo was the best off loader in the game before SBW returned. In that regard the NZW were the right team for Wigan to prep against for the Roosters.



By the way Wigan fans. Based on what you know of Tomkins , how do you think he will go in a team that has forwards looking to offload at every opportunity like the NZW ? will he chase up looking for those offloads ?



My other question is around our back line deficit.....as I say we desperately need a player that can move the ball well to the three quarter line....Wingers and s Like Hurrell and Vatuvei who up until now have to make a fist of slow poorly timed passes / feeds from our spine......is Sam Tomkins a player who would set up our frighteningly powerful and fast outside backs ?

Just like Sam Thaiday and that Aboriginal fella who played at Cas a few seasons back.

I'd say he'll definitely feed the backs, he tends to turn up on the fringes in the right place at the right time to either dance through the line himself or send someone through. I haven't seen him pick up too many offloads from the forwards but then again we don't tend to offload much

I thought it was a pretty good game to be honest, especially Wigan's performance in the second half.



Bateman looked excellent, although he may lack a bit of size. I'm sure Wigan will put that right in the coming seasons. Powell was the best player on the pitch by quite some margin, and those saying he should be picked ahead of Green are correct.



I really like the way that, regardless of the personnel on the pitch, Wigan play the same patterns, and execute the attacking plays well. In fact, the so called second string in the second half, showed the more established players how to execute their own plays.



The stream on Wigan TV was also flawless.

Full game is now on youtube, pleasure to watch these young lads show their stuff

Just watching the game again and got to Menfredi's break and subsequent try. As we now know, Manfredi is no slouch, but did you see the staggering speed of Hampshire catching him up in support? How fast is Rocky, bloody hell!

that's why he's called rocky.



the attack looks a lot more fluid and that should only improve with the inclusion of o'loughlin and to a lesser extent green. burgess has cemented his place and the left side looks far more dangerous than last year.



i don't see clubb making the cut for the roosters game, i hold out hope he will improve but at the moment he looks lethargic and ineffectual. If he doesn't play we'll probably have hughes or bateman with farrell in the second row and that leaves the pack looking small compared to the roosters who i fear could be too strong given we struggled with the warriors when they just rolled up the middle with their props.

Thanks for the reply. We are hoping Tomkins will be used around Mateo who is a Try maker with his offloads.