He wasn’t looking for a move whilst under contract but he had no intention of staying when it expired. The club decided to let him go a year early in order to benefit from what turned out to be a transfer fee which he was happy to accept.

He is not an average player that is your opinion, I know this feeds your need to absolve the club of a possible error in letting him go.

So not what you said then.

Difference is we signed a well known sick note and let a decent player go.

Yet this decent player couldn't get another club.

After 5 rounds can still only get a trial.

So I'm not sure we made such a bad decision.

Absolves, typically huge assumption from yourself that the is anything to absolve. But hey don’t let that disrupt your agenda.

So Ryan never got injured?



How is Gaskell a sick note, either the medical staff say he’s injured or he isn’t. Or are you calling Gaskell a liar.

A better term might have been 'injury prone'.

Wrong again poppy he's signed untill the end of the season, in Rocky's place we signed an injury prone player who could'nt finish his 1st game a player to cover fullback and half back and because of his injury we now have no cover at fullback, so we have to get a player in on loan and have to pay more wages! Great bit of business, lets see at the end of the season who ends up with the better deal us or cas.

The op said it was a trial. I don't have the inside Cas knowledge you have.

If he's contracted to the end of the season then good for him.

I rate him. I just don't think he's the messiah some think he is.



Edit: the only article I can find about him says he's on a one month trial.

Take it from me he's signed Cas have players from this side of the big hill you know.

You seem to be the only one that knows that. Even Cas Forum is discussing it as a one month trial.