Marriage of convenience







Comes as bit of a shock really, i had him down as a player of other code

Both the Hetheringtons' daughters work for Leeds. Looks like it's only Kath and the prospective son-in-law who are banished to East Yorkshire.



Intriguing the [url=http://www.therhinos.co.uk/club/staff/index.phpnumber of staff Leeds have on the payroll[/url compared to Hull - their profits aren't that much bigger are they? Wish the Heths would have the same "big club mentality" thinking at Hull as they have at Leeds. When would be the day that Leeds recruited Agar as Head coach?

Interesting indeed wormy

Not really, a lot of them roles will be covered by SMC

Wonder how long they've been together. I know of at least 1 lass who knows him and she ain't a Leeds fan!!

is that the swear filter?

I think both the Hetherington children also have or have had shares in Hull FC as does Gary, but seeing he is an employee at Leeds its OK. The only time a problem could arise is IF Caddick decides to move on or sell out and I would expect Hetherington family PLC to make a move. I am not suprised he has his two daughters working for Leeds, most of try to look after our kids. Its that bloody 4x4 with Leeds Rhino's colours and logo parked outside the KC that gets up mine and other's noses, still if you get it for free you will use it it and they are both from Yorkshire after all.





I think the arrangement between the two clubs works well at times, but I suspect we are the junior partner and are treated as such. The loaning of players helps both clubs but there have been times when we have been .......... treated less then correctly.



Ali Lauitiiti anyone?

Perhaps including getting another car so that the one with the "RHINOS" number plate isn't at the KC on matchdays

Nope. The only Hetherington with shares in the club is Kath, who holds 30%.

Maybe not now, I am sure Gary did they have at one time as did the children as they where shareholders in Gateshead. I am in no way suggesting they are doing anything underhand at all, far from it.



its just that one can see where a conflict of interest could arise.

Then who as the rest of the 70%

Not sure of the percentages, but they are split among the other directors, IIRC Kath isn't even the largest single shareholder.