indeed. 4 stitches from one punch is quite pleasing

Would've been funny had you were the first to use the above.

He'll get what he deserves for his dirty play yes.



Oh hang on you are talking about Bailey aren't you blinkered boy

You’re response would have been funny had it been in English fool

Chill man, he's only trying to wind people up.

Quite successfully it would seem.

Bailey is a moron, crap rugby league player supported by retarded west yorkshire kn0bs!

Very grown up. Is 73 your IQ?

no my age

I know exactly why he's here and deserves all that he gets thrown back to him.

The ignomy of being roundly ignored?

I've never got the whole 'lets have a go at the troll' thing, surely that is the aim of said troll?

I'm far from an expert on these hearings, so does anyone know who represents the player and what other evidence can be brought in mitigation? The reason I ask is that everyone seems to be aware of all the other similar instances to Radders' situation and the associated inconsistencies and yet these are obviously overlooked. This can only be for two reasons - either the procedures do not allow for such evidence to be brought forward, or whoever represented the player didn't use them strongly enough to make a case.



That said I've just remembered a third, and more likely scenario...that whilst Rugby League has a cracking product on the pitch it is administered by a set of plonkers whose history of making poor and inconsistent decisions beggars belief! (Generally speaking!)

can hull and lee apply against it