I would give him a contract if he could prove to me he has good vehicle planning skills and is computer literate.

good player washy when played in the right position ,thats back row or loose man ,hes got plenty of sl exsperience and hes british ,as long as hes not asking the world hes a good squad member and i would keep him ,you carnt have 26 /27 superstars with the cap ,unless your wire that is ,so like whiting hes a valued member of the squad for me,modest 2 year deal



we dont need to be chucking loads of players on the dole ,we need a fresh comander in chief and new ideas on the training pitch ,hornes done ok at giants and i dont see any real difference with him and washy both decent squad players who can cover a number of positions if required ,which hopfully next year with the cover we have in the halfs wont be washy in there

Not as bad as people are making out. Be decent cover if was on a lower wage

Totally agree with this one, Danny has been a good servant, unfortunatley think he is at the end of the road with regards to progession, but he's a solid player and he would provide solid cover. Don't think he's on enough as it is to warrant a pay cut though...

if we really want to challenge then players like Washy need to go, so long as we can bring better in.

Easy. Where's Willie?

My thoughts excatly. Very good defensive player and can do a job in the back row when required. Never been a half bak or hooker.

Which SL clubs would sign Washbrook if he was available? Wigan , Wire , Sts , Leeds , Catalan? Don't think so. I'd rather give a youngster a chance than have him block any chance of their development.

rovers

Many a true word spoken in jest





He meets all their criteria:



1. Cheap

2. (presumably) Available

3 Ex- Hull FC

Keep.



If any youngsters showed a hint of being ready for SL they would have been in by now.



Inexpensive, versatile, local & will improve under a decent coach. Was one of out better players back in 2008 ish ?