Totally agree about Cusack top forward which is why his NRL career spells out his ability. Moa did OK and we didn't miss Radford at all. That said I would play Radford next week. It's called strength in depth.

so did i and he capped it off with a try,

rubbish, Sam did not show anything last night to say he should be in ahead of yak.

But he did say that were Yak unavailable we would not be weakened by playing Sam in his place.

possibly however IMO i think Cusak brings more to the side than Sam,

Big fan of Cusack myself so agree with you. Sam is good cover and I'll guarantee you that we will be without one if not two props over a 25+ league game season and this is why our pack strength in depth is crucial. Sam is good enough quality to contribute to this squad game.

I agree Sam is quality I am not disagreeing there, I just find Cusack brings more to the team, thats all. our pack will be the key to our (hopefully) success.

Of that there is absolutely no doubt.

Shocking.

where was you sat?

the roger millward stand?

Right lets try again.



Based upon the way other players have advanced there game this season, I have been disappointed that the yak hasn't.



Yes, hes doing ok....buts that the problem, in my opinion we need to try Moa in that position in order to assess (and not after 1 game) wether or not big sam can bring more to the party?



How else as a team are we going to get stronger if we dont give fringe players the opportunity to show there worth?



And for other forum members who throw the cheap rovers shots at me....Grow up this is a an adult discussion.

The guy has been at the club for a good while now and all parties will surely know what he brings to the table, they see him in training every day. Maybe he just is always going to be a fringe player but like a few have said, he will get a chance somewhere down the line.