Don't think he did, watched the match recording when I got home and never noticed the crossed arms. Reckon if the roles were reversed and Cockayne had ted Manu, he would have been off.

www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... iting.html

www.sportinglife.com/rugbyleague ... iting.html

No way would Murrell make up such a claim IMO...

The tackle in question is just inside the 36 mins mark. Hard to tell really what's going on.

you hear Bentham say to the linesman that "you can see teethmarks so we better put it on report" or words to that effect. Manu didnt get put on report, but as someone said above, had it been Cockayne on Manu, hed have had ten minutes (at least)

disgusting and hopefully he'll be missing for at least the first two months of next season because of it

Yes if there is a case to answer. did you see the incident mr b ?

Of course he did, surely he'd make sure he was right before making such a post.

Scott must have mistaken his own arm for a sweet then and left the mark his self

its on the 36.06 mark...provided you never hit the yellow button like our rivals

Can you imagine what these boards would be like if Tom Briscoe had accused Ben Cockayne of biting him!! If it gets proved that he did it, which is very difficult, then he deserves a lengthy ban.

Berrigan normally wears a gumshield - you can see him take it out after he scored in the last derby. Was he wearing one last night? Not sure how you get a full set of teethmarks wearing one, but still. Just find it so out of character for him. Agree he should get a long ban if he's done it though.