Remind me where David Hodgson and the staff that carried him off the pitch were in relation to the incident.



The TV didn't show it as it was? The camera never lies.

All I ever did was state what they had said.

I did also say that you can believe what ever you want as well.



You did however wrongly state that I was wrong when that wasn't my opinion is was commenting on.

You made a statement followed by "if folks chose not to believe that...", this is insinuating that you're sold on their story and have changed your mind.



Stop being an idiot.



Everyone can see the contact in the tackle is in the wrong place to cause such damage. Taking into account that the heel then is seen to practically stamp the part of Lincoln's head where the laceration is, I'd say that's case closed.



Hodgson, 40 yards away? Staff that carried him off, 50-70yards away? Camera, in on the action.

Then you would be incorrect AGAIN.

It isn't my fault that you wrongly assumed what I meant.

Clearly I'm not going to get an apology for your wrong assumption though.

So what do you think caused the laceration?

His heel as I stated right at the start.



All I did was say what they had said.

Oh, in future you should follow up with "but I think they're talking anus".



Then it wouldn't make you look like a massive vagina doing a u-Turn.

Or you could ask me outright what I meant instead of jumping to conclusions.

I don't believe it. Only if RLFANS Correspondent confirms this opinion, will I believe it.



For the record it's clearly a laceration wound caused by a jagged/bladed egde.



Postscript

Excellent use of animated GIFs Dum.

Ouch, I hope he was in cuckoo land before that heal made contact!

Jesus man what is wrong with you! get a grip it is only a friggin forum not a court of law

As tough as rugby is, you don't see that many sickening injuries. This was probably the worst seen at Rovers since Chev Walker's leg.

Nasty stuff indeed.