And I totally think he should...in 2014..the benefits for England will be great! www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18623822

And I totally think he should...in 2014..the benefits for England will be great! www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/18623822

No surprise and I would be surprised if he didnt. Much rather that than him going to Union.

What exactly would be the benefits for England?

A move to the NRL would benefit Toomkins like it did Ellis, Morley, and Thorman.

Much better than him going to Union. Really pleased that the NRL is getting all this money and a much bigger cap. Superficially it looks like a threat to RL here, but longer term its good. The real long term threat is Union and I treat *any* successful growth of League, in whatever country, as good news in that regard. As another poster says, better we lose players to the NRL.



One day, when Nigel Wood and the others have gone, someone good will come along, with the vision and ability to take RL in the UK to another level. The existence of a successful NRL will be of a great help to people with the ability and insight to capitalise on it.

Why would it?

Because the NRL is a superior competition? As in all sports if you're playing at the highest level you're likely to improve. Tomkins is not playing at that level.

Yes, just what we need. One of 2 bona fide world class players super league has, leaving the competition.



Give it 5 years and the standard across the board of super league will be of Cas, wakey, widnes and hull kr standard

Superleague has bottomed out in terms of quality and intensity, we have only a few english superleague players who are or potentional world class. Tomkins to be honest has not been really been tested because of superleagues slack defences, he would have to play against his own team Wigan to be tested.

The other side of the coin is that all our best players could be in the NRL, the international team would be stronger but superleague weaker and weaker.

How woud you address that situation?

I was being sarcastic. If you look at Ellis' and Morley's international performanes they were better before they went to the NRL, and Thorman was a great prospect before the NRL coached the flair out of him. The NRL is not the be all and end all. The focus has to be on improving SL, and we're never going to do that if all our best players go to the NRL.



Saying that if him going to the NRL meant he stayed in RL then thats fair enough.

I agree the SL will be a weaker comp if players like Sam leave but surely it has to be better than going to the dark side.

I still feel that the quality of RL players in SL has diminished because of the overseas quota.



We don't have the talent pool in this country to improve matters as it stands, so why increase the number of teams and decrease the number of available players?



Quality will out. Burgess, Tomkins et all would break into teams regardless of the make up of that team. Without the overseas quota, they might have to work harder to do that, but surely THAT is a good thing for the players, league and international team? Players that have pushed and earned the jersey are going to be better and more loyal than those who get praised to high heaven just because they happen to be young and British.