The double movement decision for the Carvell try was terrible. Textbook definition of double movement.

Yep, totally agree, ball carrying arm touches the ground, if an opposition player has his little finger on you, that's the end of the tackle.

Any one else not have a clue about the interpretation of the dragging into touch rule.

I thought the interpretation was that it just how the referee feels on the day?

I think the worst thing is that (recently at least) one team has gotten nearly every 50/50 call.



Shown again there by Briers knocking on and Silverwood didn't bring it back despite there being no advantage played.

Disgusting decision from Smith. Is it me or do Warrington play different rules when it comes to double movements. Silverwoods defintely trying to keep the Warrington crowd happy.



Be interesting if Westwood gets called up. Will it be the same 2 ban Ferriol got?

The game is being refereed in a different way from yesterdays game, where is the consistency?

50 50

Thats correct and with that comes "benefit of doubt" so for me its the right call.

Why wasn't that benefit of the doubt?

Carvell never even grounded the ball, it rolled off Grix's arm as well as it being a double movement.

Just watched it again and you're right. He puts the ball on Grix's arm then knocks on.